Do You Have To Register To Vote Every Year In Pa

💌 Dearest Philly? Sign up for the free Billy Penn e-mail newsletter to go everything yous need to know almost Philadelphia, every day.

If you get to a polling place to cast your vote in person, will you lot be required to show ID?

The curt answer is no.

You lot practice not need to show photo ID to vote in Pennsylvania.

If you're a first-timer in a sure district, yous will exist required to provide some kind of identification by poll workers. It can be either have a photo or be another approved grade. However, if you're returning to the same polling location as earlier, not just can you skip photo ID, just poll workers aren't even immune to enquire you for it.

Here's the state's list of approved identification y'all tin can use if it'south your start fourth dimension at a location.

What almost post ballot voting? Yous also must validate your identification for that, only again, photograph ID is non required. This is true whether you lot utilize for a ballot online or at a county lath of election office (or satellite part).

Approved photo ID for in-person voting

Pennsylvania driver's license or PennDOT ID card
ID issued by any democracy bureau
ID issued by the U.S. regime
U.Due south. passport
U.Southward. armed forces ID
Student ID
Employee ID

Approved non-photograph ID for in-person voting

(Must prove proper noun and address)

Confirmation issued by the county Voter Registration Office
Non-photo ID issued by the commonwealth
Non-photo ID issued by the U.South. government
Firearm permit
Current utility bill
Current bank statement
Electric current paycheck
Authorities check

Canonical ID for for mail election application

Pennsylvania commuter'due south license or PennDOT ID card
Last 4 digits of your Social Security number
U.S. passport
U.South. war machine ID (Active duty and retired ID may designate an expiration date that is indefinite; dependents' ID must contain a current expiration date)
Employee photo identification issued by federal, Pennsylvania, county, or municipal government
Photograph ID issued by an accredited Pa. institution of higher learning
Photo ID issued by a Pa. care facility (long-term care, assisted living residences, personal care homes)

A brief history of Pennsylvania's contempo controversy over voter ID

Despite in that location non being any photograph requirement, you lot might have someone tell you they're you need identification to vote, even if it's non your first fourth dimension at a location.

That might exist because in 2012, the commonwealth did implement a voter ID clause. It tried, anyway, until the law got shot downwardly in court. Here's the history

March 2012

Then-Governor Tom Corbett, a Republican, signed into law a bill that would require voters to present valid photo identification at the polls.

The signing was done in ASAP fashion, just hours after the Pa. House passed the pecker. That had come simply about a week subsequently the state Senate approved it, then the whole matter was turned around with unusual speed.

The bill passed almost entirely on party lines: the entire Autonomous caucus voted against it, and all but iii Republicans voted in favor. The bill's supporters argued the constabulary would improve the security of elections, despite Pennsylvania never having recorded any reports of voter fraud.

The police was one of the most restrictive voter ID laws in the country — certainly the strictest in whatever state expected to exist competitive in that yr'southward presidential race. Information technology disallowed welfare cards and school district employee cards as verification, and higher IDs without an expiration date.

Experts estimated it would disenfranchise at least 9 percentage of people in Pennsylvania, and other reports argued information technology would unduly affect people of color.

April 2012

Pennsylvania gave the law a "trial run" in the primaries. During that election, voters were asked for identification but non turned away if they couldn't provide it.

June 2012

House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, a Republican representing Allegheny County, was defenseless on video saying the constabulary could aid swing the state red and in candidate Mitt Romney'south column in the 2012 presidential election.

This was, obviously, a major gaffe on his part. The bill was signed into law on the premise that it would lower voter fraud, not provide political gain for one party over the other.

August 2012

Several organizations, including the NAACP, the League of Women Voters and the Homeless Advocacy Project challenged the police in court, arguing that it would disenfranchise voters who might non have or might exist unable to obtain the proper photo ID.

The case landed in front of a Commonwealth Court Judge Robert Simpson, a Republican, who upheld the voter ID requirement. His ruling said the "burden" of getting the proper identification did not outweigh the anti-fraud benefits, and that the challengers had not conspicuously proved the constabulary would in fact deny voters' rights, violating the constitution.

September 2012

The case was appealed to the Pa. Supreme Court, which decided that no affair whether the police force was eventually found to be constitutional or not, there was the calendar to consider.

With the Nov. 2016 elections just months abroad, the Supreme Courtroom asked, would Pennsylvania actually be able to get proper IDs to all voters in time? Information technology remanded the example back to Simpson, asking him to hold hearings on the matter and return with an respond by Oct. 2.

October 2012

Simpson came to the conclusion that the time crunch might exist also difficult to surmount, and ordered land elections officials not to enforce the law in the upcoming election.

This effectively extended the "trial run" instituted dorsum in April'due south primaries, although Simpson'south ruling did allow some parts of the new law to stand. The country was allowed to continue efforts to brainwash citizens that a photo ID would be a voting requirement, and too allowed election officials to enquire for a photo ID, fifty-fifty though it wasn't required.

Jan 2014

The police was not significantly addressed in courtroom again until the next statewide primary elections encroached, one and a half years afterwards.

This fourth dimension effectually, the case fell to a different guess, Commonwealth Court Approximate Bernard McGinley. Dissimilar Simpson'southward inconclusive "well, at that place's not enough time to enact this" decision, McGinley's ruling was much more definitive. The police, he said, was unnecessarily restrictive, and information technology violated the land constitution because it "unreasonably burdens the right to vote."

"Voting laws are designed to assure a free and off-white election," McGinley'due south determination stated. "The Voter ID Law does non further this goal."

That ruling from 4 years ago still governs Pennsylvania's current election procedure. As the country'south official guidance on voter ID says:

In 2014, the Commonwealth Court held that the in-person proof of identification requirements enacted nether Act eighteen of 2012 were unconstitutional. Those provisions are no longer in force fifty-fifty though you may see them in Pennsylvania's Election Lawmaking.